Coronary Artery Disease And Cardiovascular System

The cardiovascular system is one of the most important systems in the body and responsible for the delivery of oxygen, nutrients and the removal of wastes from cellular and tissue levels. These products are transported within the blood through an interconnected system of blood vessels throughout the body with the heart being the power and force to pump it to the body. With the interaction of the many body systems, the blood is able to be regulated, oxygen and nutrients are able to get to the tissues and cells, and lastly the waste products are able to be excreted and removed. The vascular endothelium is very important in the functioning of the cardiovascular system because of its vast functionality. When the vascular endothelium is in†¦show more content†¦The left one supplies blood to the left ventricle and atrium and the right supplies blood to the right atrium and ventricle. These vessels supply the heart with the oxygen and nutrients that are required to function and s urvive (Sanders, Lewis, Quick, McKenna, 2007, p. 123-124). In the case of an individual with CAD, the most common cause is atherosclerosis. It is a chronic inflammatory reaction in the artery walls with deposits of fatty proteins/lipids and cholesterol (Drake, Vogl, Mitchell, 2015, p. 27). The inflammatory process is a pathological feature that contributes to the stages of atherosclerosis. It is initiated by attracting white blood cells such as monocytes and T lymphocytes to the injury site. The injury site can be caused by risk factors that can contribute to the disease such as; non-modifiable risk factors that include advanced age, men or women post menopause, family history or modifiable risk factors that include hypertension, smoking, diabetes and insulin resistance, obesity, hyperlipidemia and a sedentary lifestyle (Huether McCance, 2008, p. 622). The monocytes mature in macrophages and Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) begin oxidisation. Once these LDL’s have been oxidi sed they penetrate the damaged endothelial lining and gather between the tunica intima and tunica media (two layers of an artery wall), where the macrophages then engulf the LDL’s forming foam cells that accumulate to form lesions called fatty streaks. With damage to the

The Korean War - 1641 Words

During the times of the 1950’s the whole world was in a state of unrest, the downfall of Hitler in Europe had left an enormous swath of land that was half occupied by the allies and half occupied by the USSR(Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) which were communist. On the other side of the world in the pacific theater Japan had succumbed to the force of the United States and was defeated leaving all their conquered territory up for grabs. A specific region of interest that was given up by Japan were the Koreas which were divided into two countries that we know today as North Korea and South Korea. Conflicts erupted between both the communist north and the capitalist south, North Korea invaded South Korea and the United States had to step†¦show more content†¦In North Korea, communism ruled supreme in government and in South Korea a more capitalist approach was prevalent in their government. . The spread of communism didn’t stop and kept its march downward thro ugh the peninsula at a steady pace. â€Å"On June 25th, 1950 75,000 North Korean troops poured into South Korea which kick started the beginning of the Korean War. This lead to a civil war between North and South Korea which was soon brought to international attention when the U.S. came to the aid of South Korea and the Peoples republic of China (PRC) came to the aid of North Korea.†1 The United States agreed that the spread of communism should not be allowed to continue its advance into South Korea, arriving to the decision that military action would be required. The Americans knew that the invasion of South Korea by North Korea was just a mask of the advance of communism into the region. â€Å"In July, just a few months after the wars beginning American troops landed in South Korea to help stop the invading force of North Koreans.†2 The North Korean invasion came as an alarming surprise to American officials. As far as they were concerned, this was not simply a borde r dispute between two unstable dictatorships on the other side of the globe. Instead, many feared it was the first step in a communist campaign to take over the world. It was because of this reason that

Beliefs In The Actions & Teachings Of The Historical Simply Jesus

Question: Write an essay explaining first how Wright tries to show the roots of these beliefs in the actions and teachings of the historical Jesus. Secondly, whether or not you agree with or hold these beliefs, do you find Wrights analysis explaining why and how these beliefs arose to be persuasive? Answer: Nicholas Thomas Wright (Tom Wright) is a renowned British scholar who strongly believes and supports the need of a scriptural presence in respect to visions of theological studies. He has always been a vivid reader of biblical texts which made him worry that evangelicalism has been stretched too much by debates and lines instead of by scripture. In his book, Simply Jesus, he has displayed an entrancing vision of Jesus Christ along with his reason for existence. It has invigorated and diversified the knowledge we had about Jesus in regards to his story and culture of past times. Wright makes a very provocative claim in this book that after around 2000 years of belief, we might be wrong about Jesus. According to (Isbouts, 2012), much confusion has taken place over Jesus Christ, which is partially due to the result of historical and cultural difference, and partially because of what Jesus said and did was unusual in those times. He believes that we have diminished Jesus by trying to fit him into the concept of either a social reformer or Gods personification. In the earlier pages of his book, Wright questions the conservative crusaders as well as liberal cynics by asking them to put down their war weapons and linger on the questions about the real incidents. The writer is successful in identifying how the acts, words, rituals, symbolic phrases deeply influence ideas in Jesuss time. Wright paints a clear picture of Jesuss perfect storm in his own regards to aid us in seeing it with this century eyes. It is the collision of the dreams and hopes of the Jewish, th e Roman magnificent takeover of the universe as well as the wind of God which lead the way for Jesus to come to the rescue of humanity from their predicament. Jesus fits into the role of God when Wright says that He was the one in whose presence, work, and teaching Israels God was indeed becoming king. Teaching statements given by Jesus mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew is quite rich and it gives insights of how Jesus believed in humanity (Anderson, 2012). His intention was not to set theology or teaching doctrines. Rather, he established his teachings along with commandments within his ministry (Matt. 28.20). Jesuss teachings were considered very enigmatic and cryptic by the Christians because they believed that Gods kingdom was coming to stand in a unique way (Harvey, 2012). The writer also observes that the repetitive reminiscence of the exodus was very significant and important for Israel, although they had failed to be the messiah in a violent way. Jesus had been involved in a cosmic war which could be termed as clash of kingdoms but it was not with Greek or Romans. (Duling, 2012) suggests that Jesus is very suited to the role of messiah since he personifies the place where it is considered that earth and heaven meet. His desire solely rested on the thought of Gods kingdom would come on earth as in heaven. The question might arise that if Jesus was Gods King, then why his death took place. Wright concludes that it is only because of his love for his people. The replaced life of loving the innocent one did give the ability to turn around the waves of the cosmic war in his favor. But de ath was not the only answer. Jesuss resurrection was required which not only revives him but also establish the beginning of a new age where he is ideally considered as the Gods King and the world as his kingdom project (Wojciechowski. 2014). Personally, it can be said that Jesus was really just trying to show what God was in real sense and exactly how His Kingdom of Heaven functioned through his miracles and teachings. He believed and preached that love and peace cannot be achieved by violence, bloodshed or conquest. It can only be gained with the true meaning of love, sacrifice, and humility. Sometimes even death. Wright appears to have no conviction in the concept of Rapture where Jesus is believed to return. He seems more like the follower and believer of Amillennialism which rejects the belief of Jesus serving thousand long physical years on the earth. However, it still cannot rationalize the existence of a superior power which is working around this world for the past centuries (Cobb, 2014). Though this does not concern my concept of rapture, I can agree with the notions put across by Wright in his book. The concluding chapter in Wrights book raises a very imminent question - What on earth does it mean, today, to sa y that Jesus is king, that he is Lord of the world? It can be said that the writer goes for a transformed sense of earthly vocation since it is evident that humans play a key role in the project of Gods kingdom. As said earlier, Wright believes that the community of human is confused with the idea of Jesus. Trying to categorize Jesus in any definitive theory is symptomatic of a much larger malaise that we have not allowed Jesus himself to express his part (Ascough, 2012). Yes, it seems that the beliefs we have followed for such a long period of time, that over the years it has become persuasive to our cause. The belief that Jesus still rules our world is a very controversial and challenging idea. People have theocracy which states that priests are the official spokesperson and they tells us from whats right and wrong. Allowing the church to act as the hierarchy and believing that they have the upper hand isnt substantial enough. Christians need to be studying how to make it happen t hat God is King on earth as in heaven. Our faith focuses on Jesus Christ along with all the witness and texts to support Christs life here on earth. Nevertheless, even being a strong believer, we all sometimes have asked ourselves the question in the back of our minds. The question which still remains Who was Jesus, actually and what was his belief? References Anderson, William Angor. The Gospel Of Matthew. Liguori, MO: Liguori Publications, 2012. Print. Ascough, Richard S. "The Triumph Of Christianity: How The Jesus Movement Became The World's Largest Religion. By Rodney Stark. San Francisco: Harperone, 2011. Pp. Vi + 506. Cloth, $27.99.". Relig Stud Rev 38.3 (2012): 173-173. Web. Cobb, John B. "Why Jesus?". Dialog 53.3 (2014): 213-222. Web. Duling, Dennis C. A Marginal Scribe. Eugene, Or.: Cascade Books, 2012. Print. Harvey, Paul. Moses, Jesus, And The Trickster In The Evangelical South. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2012. Print. Isbouts, Jean-Pierre. In The Footsteps Of Jesus. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic, 2012. Print. Wojciechowski, Micha. "Teachings Of Jesus And Popular Hellenistic Stories". BPTh 7.1 (2014): 43. Web. Wright, N. T. Simply Jesus. New York: HarperOne, 2011. Print.

The book The Age of Empire

The book The Age of Empire: 1875-1914 by Eric Hobsbawm gives a detailed analysis of the late 19th century history. During the time, there were rapid changes towards the idea of imperialism. In the text, the author describes the period as important because it led to the establishment of new empires and political structures.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The book The Age of Empire specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The book also describes some of the roles played by historians and great thinkers at the time. Hobsbawm identifies two groups of historians during this period. We have some historians who looked forward for ideas and explanations in order to understand much about the present and the future (Hobsbawm 23). The other group of historians looked backward with great nostalgia. The author considers them as less optimistic and only looks backward with nostalgia. These historians only consider the events that hav e taken place in the past. The other group looks forward in order to foretell the events that might take place in our world. This group also examines certain thoughts such as those of religion, imperialism and capitalism thereby understanding what might take place in the coming days. These historians want to be prepared and address any issue as faced in the future (Hobsbawm 87). However, it is agreeable that the two groups of historians helped a lot towards shaping the world as it is today. Those who looked backwards with nostalgia helped conserve some ideas relating to religion, culture and traditions. I personally argue that Hobsbawm belongs to the group that is anxious about the present and the future. The author has examined the present situation as faced in the 19th century and offered possible explanations about what would happen in the future. He examines the progression and optimism of some nations about the future. Hobsbawm belongs to the group that wants to remain prepared in the event of war and conflict. This gives the author an upper hand to understand how future political foundations might look like (Hobsbawm 78). This includes how to promote the idea of capitalism in the future days.Advertising Looking for essay on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The other important discussion is that of liberal bourgeois capitalism. In the 19th century, capitalism became a strong force and thereby it led to the establishment of aristocracy in Europe and the West. As the aristocrats considered themselves powerful, the author addresses the issue of the bourgeois class. This class was becoming powerful day by day. They benefited from the industrial revolution and cheap labor from the peasants. As a result, the class became powerful and eventually resulted in revolutions. The liberal class overthrew the aristocrats from power through massive revolutions (Hobsbawm 98). The wave of capitalism would bec ome stronger than ever before. The countries were now ready to become powerful than ever before. It is also acknowledgeable that the author has presented a convincing argument about the foundation of tradition. At the time when the idea of mass politics was becoming evident, different nations were competing for global attention and power. They combined their quest with culture and tradition.( Hobsbawm 102) The nations wanted to get their own colonies while maintaining their unique traditions and culture. Very soon, there was the global mass politics with more countries trying hard to portray their powers to the world. The nations established different empires while maintaining their unique identity and culture. This would eventually result in global conflicts as prophesized by some historians earlier. Works Cited Hobsbawm, Eric. The Age of Empire: 1875-1914. New York: Vintage Books, 1989. Print. This essay on The book The Age of Empire was written and submitted by user Braydon Wright to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.